IQ与EQ辩论的范文谁有最好是英语写的

IQvsEQ

byR.Rubadeau

WhileIQ(IntelligenceQuotient)defineshowsmartyouare,EQ(EmotionalQuotient)defineshowwellyouusewhatsmartsyouhave.PeterSalovey,YalepsychologistandauthorofthetermEQ,statesthatIQgetsyouhired,EQgetsyoupromoted.Healsosuggeststhatit'simportanttoredefine,inourcomplexworld,whatitmeanstobesmart.Inshort,whenitcomestopredictingfuturesuccesses,brainpower,asmeasuredbyIQandstandardizedachievementtests,mayactuallymatterlessthanthecharacter,orEQofanindividual.

Saloveytellsofasimpletestwherefouryearoldsareinvitedintoaroomandaregiventhefollowinginstruction:Youcanhavethismarshmallowrightnow;orifyouwait,youcanhavetwomarshmallowswhenIgetback.Then,theresearcherleaves.Somekidsgrabforthetreatthesecondhe'soutthedoor,whileotherswaitfortheresearchertoreturn.TheresultsarerecordedandSciencewaitsforthekidstogrowup.Bythetimethekidsreachhighschool,significantdifferencesappearbetweenthetwogroups.Thekidswhoheldoutfortwomarshmallowswerebetteradjusted,morepopular,moreadventurous,moreconfident,andmoredependablethankidsinthequickgratificationgroup.Thelattergroupwasalsomorelikelytobelonely,moreeasilyfrustrated,morestubborn,morelikelytobuckleunderstress,andmorelikelytoshyawayfromchallenges.Whenbothgroupstookscholasticaptitudetests,theholdoutgroupwallopedthequickgratificationgroupby210points(thetestscoresrangefromaminimumof200pointstoamaximumof800,withanaverageforallstudentsof500points).

Didyoueverwonderwhathappenedtothesmartestkidintheclasswhodidn'tendupbeingsuccessful,orwhysomeofyourfriendssurvivethegreatesttraumawhileotherscrumbleoverminorissues?Perhapsitisbecauseofdifferencesinaperson'sEQ.EQisnottheoppositeofIQ,andindeeditishopedthatpeoplehavegenerousquantitiesofboth.But,thereislittledoubtthatpeoplewithoutsufficientEQwillhaveahardtimesurvivinginlife.

Forfivegenerationsresearchershavebeendiscussingwhetherit'spossibletoraiseaperson'sIQ.GeneticistssayNo,whilesocialscientistssayYes.Butwhilebrainpowerresearcherscontinuethedebate,socialscienceresearchershaveconcludedthatit'spossibletoimproveaperson'sEQ,andinparticular,aperson'speopleskills,suchasempathy,graciousness,andtheabilitytoreadasocialsituation.Socialscientistscontinuallycitesituationswhereexperienceshavemodifiedaperson'sEQ.Forexample,educationalresearchersindicatethatwhennormalstudentsareintroducedtodisabledpeers,thoseintheformergroupdramaticallyimprovetheirabilitytobecomeempatheticandgracious.Additionally,theintroductionofbehaviourallydisturbedstudentsinaclassofnormalagedpeersincreasestheabilityofthelattergrouptolearntoreadsocialsituations.Amoreprofoundimprovementisfrequentlynotedinthebehaviourallydisturbedstudentaswell.

SocialscientistsconcludethatEQisperhapsbestobservedinpeopledescribedaseitherpessimistsoroptimists.OptimistshavehighEQandtreatobstaclesasminor,whilethepessimisticlow-EQgrouppersonalizesallsetbacks.Insocialresearchcircles,highEQdenotesone'sabilitytosurvive,andit'sherethattheremaybeanoverlapbetweenEQ,IQ,geneticsandenvironment.Inthisregard,IamremindedofthewordsofDarwin,Thebiggest,thesmartest,andthestrongestarenotthesurvivors.Rather,thesurvivorsarethemostadaptable.Thoseofuswhosurviveandthriveinthiscomplexworldarenotonlythemostadaptable,butalsothemostoptimisticandthemostlikelytohaveahighEQ.

<<Education